In one of my many incarnations I’m a
manuscript assessor. This means I trawl through a publisher’s slush
pile assessing, rejecting and occasionally, only very, very
occasionally, passing a manuscript onto an in-house editor for closer
inspection.
I’ve been reading a lot of
submissions for picture books lately, and if there’s one thing I’m
finding that’s common for almost every picture book manuscript I’ve
read, it’s problems with metre and rhyme.
I know it’s a bit of a cliché –
kids love rhyme but editors hate it – so I’ll come right out and
admit that yes, picture books that rhyme don’t really appeal to me.
I know, what a party pooper. Call me
the Grinch*.
So I’ve just had a look at my
bookshelf and very few of my favourite picture books rhyme. There are
some notable exceptions of course, and I’m pretty sure there are a
few sneaky ones on my shelf that are so well done I don’t even
think of them as rhyming. But the fact remains that I have to work
especially hard not to read prejudicially when faced with a rhyming
picture book. And it almost never fails to send me on a ‘is this me
or is there really a problem here?’ tail spin when I read a text
that rhymes.
I should also say that I found bad
rhyme and metre a problem when I worked as a teacher too, back when I
was a public performer of picture books and the ability to read a
text effortlessly was very, very important.
So I’ve been thinking carefully about
this and I’ve come to a conclusion. While I’m happy to admit my
prejudices, I’m still confident in my assessment that rhyme is
actually a very, very difficult thing to get right. And when it’s
not done right, it reads very badly indeed.
And that’s the thing about rhyme:
it’s all too rarely done well. And to me, bad rhymes unravells an
entire work.
For it to be good it needs to be
seamless. It needs to feel like the rhyme is just a coincidence, that
each word was always going to be in that order – I need to feel
like there was no other word that could have finished the sentence
and it just so happens that it rhymes with the last word of the
previous line. I don’t want to get the sense that sentences were
constructed around the rhyme and that having to rhyme has
directed the course of the plot (you need a rhyme for cat so you have
the cat sit on a mat, etc.). Too often rhyming appears contrived and
irrelevant to the story. And don’t forget that, while a picture
book can be far more sophisticated than a chapter book, you still
need to make age-appropriate word choices – just because
‘capillary’ rhymes with ‘quietly’ doesn’t mean you should
use it.
To me, if you’re going to rhyme, the
rhythm needs to be structured too. This is where metre comes into it.
Not only do the syllables in each sentence need to be in some kind of
regular pattern, but also the stresses need to be well measured too.
If you want to write rhyming picture
books (and please, please ask yourself if the rhyming is
necessary to the story) then taking a class or two in poetry is one
of the best things you can do. Maybe read Stephen Fry’s excellent
The Ode less Travelled, or find a book that works for you.
Read existing picture books and copy their rhythm to get in the right
habits. And when you’ve written it, have a friend attempt to read
it out loud and, with a copy of the piece in front of you, mark
wherever they stumble. This will give you a good indication of how
well the rhyming and metre is working.
*Yes, I am being ironic ;)
No comments:
Post a Comment